Anton Podkopaev
2018-08-15 13:19:43 UTC
Hello,
I'm trying to define a function pointwise. To do so, I'd like to prove the
following lemma:
Definition pointwise_func_def {A B} (P : B -> Prop)
(H : forall (n : A), exists fn, P fn) :
exists (f : A -> B), forall n, P (f n).
I think that it can't be proven w/o additional axioms.
Do you know how to prove the lemma?
thank you,
Anton Podkopaev
podkopaev.net
I'm trying to define a function pointwise. To do so, I'd like to prove the
following lemma:
Definition pointwise_func_def {A B} (P : B -> Prop)
(H : forall (n : A), exists fn, P fn) :
exists (f : A -> B), forall n, P (f n).
I think that it can't be proven w/o additional axioms.
Do you know how to prove the lemma?
thank you,
Anton Podkopaev
podkopaev.net